Hero essay - HaagsehonderdNl Hero essay - HaagsehonderdNl

Hero essay

Hero essay

Hero essay life of Theseus from Greek mythology. He liked a cigarette, he liked a bottle of beer — he drank a bottle of beer like any man. European nation in every possible way. Voytek also enjoyed taking hot baths for some reason.

Over the summer in Palestine, he learned how to work the showers, and you could pretty much always find him splashing around the bath house. Once, he entered the bath hut and came across a spy who had been planted to gather intelligence on the Allied camp. Voytek growled, slapped the dude upside his stupid head, and the man immediately crapped his pants and surrendered. Thanks in part to the heavy shelling by their artillery, the Polish forces broke through the Nazi defenses and captured Monte Cassino.

Voytek and his comrades would go one to fight the Germans across the Italian peninsula, breaking through the enemy lines and forcing the Krauts out of Italia for good. A community, even one dedicated to positivity, needs an enemy to define itself against. The site is one of the leading voices of the moment, thriving in the online sharing economy, in which agreeability is popularity, and popularity is value. Upworthy, the next iteration, has gone ahead and made its name out of the premise. There is more at work here than mere good feelings.

There is a consensus, or something that has assumed the tone of a consensus, that we are living, to our disadvantage, in an age of snark—that the problem of our times is a thing called «snark. The word, as used now, is a fairly recent addition to the language, and it is not always entirely clear what «snark» may be. But it’s an attitude, and a negative attitude—a «hostile, knowing, bitter tone of contempt,» is how Heidi Julavits described it in 2003, while formally bestowing the name of «snark» on it, in the inaugural issue of The Believer. In her essay, Julavits was grappling with the question of negative book reviewing: Was it fair or necessary? Was the meanness displayed in book reviews a symptom of deeper failings in the culture? Snark is supposed to be self-evidently and self-explanatorily bad: «nasty,» «low,» and «snide,» to pick a few words from the first page of David Denby’s 2009 tract Snark: It’s Mean, It’s Personal, and It’s Ruining Our Conversation.